| Author |  | 
      
        | k2zs Senior Member
 
  
  
 Joined: October 22 2009
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 113
 | 
          I was wondering... What are the advantages or disadvantages to using a USB PLC vs a Serial PLM? I am getting the impression that a PLC would operate as more of an embedded controller while a PLM is solely reliant on PowerHome being running for all of the higher functions like macros, triggers, and timed events. If you download the "Core Application" to a PLC does that also include the higher functions and a system would function as if PowerHome was running?
           | Posted: December 02 2009 at 09:01 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 __________________
 Scott, K2ZS
 Home Automation Ideas
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |       | 
       
       
        |  | 
        | grif091 Super User
 
  
 
 Joined: March 26 2008
 Location: United States
 Online Status: Offline
 Posts: 1357
 | 
          PLM runs faster.  It supports 2000+ links compared to 417 with the PLC.  Although not so important with the current Powerhome but probably in the future, the PLM supports Extended Insteon messages, the PLC does not.  I have found the PLM to be more reliable than the PLC but that is just one man’s experience.
           | Posted: December 02 2009 at 09:49 | IP Logged |   |  
           | 
 |  
 The PLC does support standalone Timers (no PC required once the Timers are defined) the PLM does not.  I guess if Timers were the only automation used you could consider it as if Powerhome was running but PH can do much more with Timed Events than a PLC Timer can do.
 
 EDIT: no macros or event based activity with a standalone PLC.
 
 Edited by grif091 - December 02 2009 at 09:51
 
 __________________
 Lee G
 | 
       
        | Back to Top |     | 
       
       
        |  |